Punch lines Controversy

I have been warned by a higher authority of the language used in my articles. Folks, there are people out there who are interested in reading my 'punch lines' only. In a recent article about the verbal spat between Dr M and Abdullah. I wrote:

• "The fact is Dr Mahathir would not use his own money to buy a Proton car." I was told that the sentence had implied that Dr M got his Proton cars for free. Duh! Of course, he got to use those Proton Perdana cars for free. It is part of his government's perks. But is it seditious?
• "Whose son got a bigger contract will not make any of them look like a worse leader". Abdullah had alleged in his CNN Talk Asia interview that Dr M sons got bigger contracts than his son. Is this seditious or factual?

I am sure some of you who are familiar with my writings will be able to gauge for their accuracy and credibility. But I know who are out there to discredit me. These people are lapdogs of certain people. They are parasites in their respective organisation but are bestowed with high positions.