Saiful Bukhari claimed he is a victim. Now, he even challenged PKR de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim to solve the matter either through mubahalah (malediction) or take oath in front of ulamaks (religious figures).
In an e-mail sent to local TV station, Saiful said: “The truth will prevail. Falsehood will surely be exposed.”
He ended the e-mail by challenging Anwar to set the time and date to solve the matter through mubahalah.
“Just inform me of the time and date. I am not afraid to keep my promise,” he added.
For me, Saiful did not act like someone who can be easily manipulated or sexually abused against his will. He fights back and he would have done the same if an act so despicable was done to him against his will.
Now, his reaction begets more questions. I do not want to be judgemental but I am sure Saiful does not need the mubahalah to tell us the truth if he was violated against his will.
Tell us the whole truth. A challenge to take oath in front of religious figures is a mere political play.
Surely Saiful does not want to be 'violated' again, this time as a political pawn.
Meanwhile, Anwar Ibrahim had lodged a report with the Federal Territory religious department against Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan for falsely accusing him of fornication. Anwar had filed a defamation suit against Saiful when he made the allegations against Anwar.
Saiful cannot act like a politician and claimed to be a victim.