Leo, Jayanthi and Sivarasa
Jayanthi LG Naidu, who is said to be the 'key witness' sought by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) in the VK Lingam case,claimed that she has been available to assist MACC in their investigations at all times.
She made this claim despite the MACC statement claiming that they could not get a key witness to testify.
"After the announcement (written reply) by Nazri on Oct 23 (that no action would be taken), I called and asked the MACC who the key witness was that they were looking for. "They were unable to answer me," she told reporters at Parliament.
She has made several serious allegations which merit a review or a reopen of the VK Lingam's case. MACC and the government risk tarnishing their image if no probe is taken against these allegations.
1) Lingam and Chin's family holiday trip to New Zealand in 1994 was planned and paid for by Lingam
2) She described how the judgment delivered by Mokhtar Sidin in the Vincent Tan vs MGG Pillai 's libel case was written in the office of Lingam.
3) She claimed that several incidents in Lingam's office where Lingam and other lawyers have also written or assisted in the writing of draft judgments.
4) She had withdrawn large sums of cash between RM100,000 and RM300,000 under Lingam's instructions to be given as 'gifts' to several judges.
Now, who is lying? The MACC, Nazri or Jayanthi?